Institutional experience with total pharyngectomy reconstruction: Exploring the role of the salivary bypass tube.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the effectiveness of salivary bypass tubes during total pharyngectomy reconstruction to prevent pharyngocutaneous fistula or pharyngoesophageal stricture. METHODS: Our study examined tubed free flap reconstruction outcomes for total pharyngectomy defects over 11 years at a single tertiary referral center. We compared postoperative fistula and stricture rates between two groups: those with salivary bypass tubes inserted during reconstruction and those without. RESULTS: Among 36 patients, 26 had radial forearm, and 10 had anterolateral thigh free flap reconstruction. 53% received salivary bypass tubes. However, the tubes did not significantly reduce the relative risks of fistula or stricture. Notably, neck dissection during total pharyngectomy was associated with increased fistula incidence. Minor salivary bypass tube-related complications affected 21% of subjects. CONCLUSION: The role of salivary bypass tubes in total pharyngectomy reconstruction remains uncertain.

Partial pharyngolaryngectomy with free flap for an unusual pharyngeal stenosis: surgical experience and literature review.

This report describes the case of a middle-aged man who attempted suicide, which resulted in laryngeal webbing and pharyngeal stenosis. The patient was compromised at the level of respiration, necessitating a tracheostomy. Alimentation was also affected, and feeding was done through a gastrostomy tube. Unfortunately, the fibrous tissues were resistant to dilatation and laser treatment. Hence, he underwent a modified partial horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy (PHSL) and pharyngectomy to excise all of the fibrous tissues formed after the incident. The resulting defect was closed with a radial forearm flap (RFF), which is an innovative means of reconstruction after PHSL. The postoperative results were satisfactory. The patient could achieve full oral intake without aspiration at 10 days and the cannula was removed at 3 weeks. This surgical technique could be applied in supraglottic cancers with extension to the pharynx, with repair of the defect by RFF, thus preserving the function of the larynx.

Cervical Osteomyelitis and Diskitis as a Complication of Neopharyngeal Breakdown: A Multisite Case Series Review.

Laryngectomy and pharyngectomy are surgical options for advanced laryngeal or pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cervical osteomyelitis-diskitis, occurring when there is dehiscence of the posterior neopharyngeal wall, is an uncommon complication of laryngopharyngectomy. This case series describes imaging findings of pharyngoesophageal wall breakdown with subsequent cervical spine infection and demonstrates that most of these patients had undergone prior esophageal or neopharyngeal dilations for benign posttreatment stricture. Neck pain, fever, or serologic evidence of infection should prompt careful evaluation for osteomyelitis-diskitis and assessment for neopharyngeal breakdown and sinus tract formation, especially in the postdilation setting.

Long-term surgical and functional outcomes after anterolateral thigh flap and free jejunal transfer reconstruction of circumferential pharyngoesophageal defects.

BACKGROUND: Circumferential pharyngoesophageal defects resulting from total pharyngolaryngectomy are commonly reconstructed using free jejunal (FJ) transfer or an anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 92 patients with ALT free flaps and 140 who underwent FJ transfer between 2009 and 2022, and compared their surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Total flap loss occurred in two (2%) and five (4%) patients in the ALT free flap and FJ transfer groups, respectively. Fistula rates were 5% in both groups. Stricture rates were 21% and 5% in the ALT free flap and FJ transfer groups, respectively (p < 0.01). At the 5-year follow-up evaluation, intelligible speech was achieved by 83% and 28% of patients (p < 0.01) in the ALT free flap and FJ transfer groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Each reconstructive method can be further optimized by proficient surgeons with expertise in the available methods and by considering patient-specific factors and available evidence.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Larynx-Preserving Open Partial Pharyngectomy and Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis with Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Adjustments.

BACKGROUND: There is a group of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) patients for whom larynx-preserving open partial pharyngectomy (PP) and radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) are indicated. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the survival difference as there is no evidence directly comparing the two therapies. METHODS: This study evaluated HPSCC patients who were initially treated by PP or RT/CRT at our institution between January 2007 and October 2019. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) were evaluated. The main analyses were performed with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustments. Sensitivity analyses compared hazard ratios (HRs) obtained with three models: unadjusted, multivariate Cox regression, and propensity score-adjusted. RESULTS: Overall, 198 patients were enrolled; 63 and 135 underwent PP and RT/CRT, respectively. IPTW-adjusted 5-year OS, DSS, LFS, and LRFS rates in the PP and RT/CRT groups were 84.3% and 61.9% (p = 0.019), 84.9% and 75.8% (p = 0.168), 94.8% and 90.0% (p = 0.010), and 75.9% and 74.1% (p = 0.789), respectively. In the IPTW-adjusted regression analysis, PP was associated with a significant benefit regarding OS (HR 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.90) and LFS (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.77). The results obtained with the three models in the sensitivity analyses were qualitatively similar to those of the IPTW-adjusted models. CONCLUSION: Despite the risk of bias related to unadjusted factors, our results suggest that PP is associated with significantly better OS and LFS compared with RT/CRT for HPSCC.

Swallowing outcomes over time after total pharyngolaryngectomy and free flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: One of the challenges after total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is to restore the swallowing function. The aim of this study was to compare swallowing outcomes between patients who underwent reconstruction with jejunum free flap (JFF) and other free flaps (OFFs). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent TPL and free flap reconstruction. The endpoints were the evolution of swallowing outcomes during the first five years after treatment assessed by the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and outcomes associated with complications. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients were included, 84 patients in the JFF group and 27 in the OFF group. The patients in the OFF group experienced more chronic pharyngostoma (p = 0.001) and pharyngoesophageal stricture (p = 0.008). During the first year, a lower FOIS score tended to be associated with OFF (p = 0.137), and this result remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that JFF reconstruction provides better swallowing outcomes than OFF reconstruction, stable over time.

Complications of pectoralis major myo-cutaneous flap, anterolateral thigh flap and radial forearm free flap after total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists regarding the most effective reconstruction after total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy (TLwPP). This study aims to compare different reconstructive techniques (pectoralis major myo-cutaneous flap, PMMCF; anterolateral thigh flap, ALTF; radial forearm free flap, RFFF) after TLwPP in terms of pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF), stenosis and feeding tube dependence (FTD) incidence. METHODS: The Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed for PCF incidence, stenosis incidence, and FTD incidence on the entire cohort. An arm-based network analysis was conducted to compare three different surgical interventions (PMMCF, ALTF, RFFF). RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 232 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. The lowest PCF absolute risk was measured for the RFFF (11.7%, 95% CI: 2.8%-33.4%), compared to the ALTF (13.4%, 95% CI: 4.5%-32.1%) and the PMMC (49.0%, 95% CI: 19.2%-79.3%). The RFFF showed a stenosis absolute risk of 0.0% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.1%), while a higher stenosis incidence was measured for the ALTF (5.7%, 95% CI: 0.8%-25.2%) and the PMMCF (11.6%, 95% CI: 0.8%-55.1%). The RFFF showed the lowest absolute risk of FTD incidence (6.8%, 95% CI: 0.5%-28.1%) compared to the other reconstructive techniques (PMMCF: 12.4%, 95% CI: 2.4%-42.1%; ALTF: 17.5%, 95% CI: 6.4%-38.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The RFFF seems the best choice for reconstruction of partial pharyngeal defects after TLwPP due to the lower incidence of PCF, stenosis and FTD compared to the ALTF and the PMMCF.

[Application of pedicle nasoseptal flap in endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of 39 cases].

Objective: To explore the therapeutic effect and contributing factors of pedicle nasoseptal flap in endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma admitted to the Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University from July 2016 to July 2019 were reviewed, with 19 males and 20 females, aging from 30 to 75 years old. All patients underwent endoscopic nasopharyngectomy, followed by reconstruction with the pedicle nasoseptal flap. The methods of preoperative assessment, mucosal flap preparation and nasopharyngeal reconstruction were summarized, and factors affecting the survival of the pedicle nasoseptal flap were discussed. The rates between groups were compared by Fisher's exact test. Results: Ipsilateral mucosal flap was used in 19 cases while contralateral mucosal flap in 20 cases. After the operation, there were 33 cases with complete epithelialization and 6 cases with flap necrosis. Univariate analysis suggested that the number of radiotherapy courses was an important factor affecting the survival of flap (OR=7.429, 95%CI: 1.120-49.270, P=0.042). However, gender, age, type of transnasal endoscopic nasopharyngectomy, osteonecrosis, side of flap and internal carotid artery resection had no influence on flap survival (all P>0.05). All patients were followed-up for 24 to 60 months. Among them, 8 patients had local recurrence and then operated again, 4 patients survived with systemic metastases and 2 patients died. Conclusion: The pedicle nasoseptal flap is a good material for reconstruction for endoscopic nasopharyngectomy, but it is less effective for patients with multiple course radiotherapy.

Exploration of anatomical landmarks for performing an endoscopic transoral nasopharyngectomy.

BACKGROUND: Performing a nasopharyngectomy via a transoral approach has been reported; however, defining landmarks to facilitate this approach has not been addressed. This study aims to explore anatomical landmarks to aid in performing a nasopharyngectomy via the transoral corridor. METHODS: An endoscopic transoral nasopharyngectomy was performed on six cadaveric specimens (12 sides). Related anatomical landmarks were defined, and the strategy to preserve the parapharyngeal internal carotid artery (pICA) was explored. RESULTS: An endoscopic transoral nasopharyngectomy was successfully achieved in all 12 sides. Utilizing the pterygoid hamulus as a landmark, the cartilaginous ET and attachments could be adequately exposed. Identification of the pICA is a prerequisite prior to Eustachian tube (ET) transection. The sphenoidal spine and the petrotympanic fissure could be sufficiently revealed in all 12 sides, which aided in transection of the cartilaginous ET without pICA injury. The ET and the prevertebral contents could be adequately removed via the transoral corridor. CONCLUSION: The pterygoid hamulus, sphenoidal spine and petrotympanic fissure serve as reliable landmarks for performing a transoral nasopharyngectomy. Identification of the pICA is a prerequisite prior to transection of the ET to avoid pICA injury.

Long-term results of robotic-assisted nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported our early experience in robotic-assisted nasopharyngectomy. The current case series is a report of our experience in 33 robotic-assisted nasopharyngectomy. METHODS: Prospective series of patients who underwent robotic-assisted nasopharyngectomy for local recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma from January 2010 to March 2019. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent robotic-assisted nasopharyngectomy with two additional second procedure for positive margin. Median age is 55 years (29-85). Twenty-five patients had rT1 disease and six patients had tumor invaded sphenoid floor (rT3). Median operative time was 227 min and median blood loss was 200 ml. The median follow-up period for all patients were 38 months. Four patients had local recurrence. Five-year local control rate, overall survival, and disease-free survival are 85.1%, 55.7%, and 69.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngectomy was showed to have a high local control rate. The operating time was comparable to open surgery.

Management of oral feeding following total laryngectomy around the world: YO-IFOS international study.

BACKGROUND: To analyze worldwide practices regarding the initiation of oral feeding after total laryngectomy (TL). METHODS: Online survey. RESULTS: Among the 332 responses received, 278 from 59 countries were analyzed. Our results showed that 45.6% of respondents started water and 45.1% started liquid diet between postoperative days 7 and 10. Semi-solid feeds were initiated between days 10 and 14 for 44.9% of respondents and a free diet was allowed after day 15 for 60.8% of respondents. This timing was significantly delayed in cases of laryngo-pharyngectomy and after prior radiotherapy (p < 0.001). A greater proportion of respondents in Africa and Oceania allowed early oral feeding before day 6 as compared with the rest of the world (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite increasing number of publications, there is still a lack of evidence to support early oral feeding. The majority of respondents preferred to delay its initiation until at least 7 days after surgery.

Circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngopharyngectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcomes of different reconstructive techniques for circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Retrospective and prospective studies were included. Two independent reviewers extracted thirty-four studies after applying the eligibility criteria. An arm-based network analysis was conducted using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The main outcomes were pharyngo-cutaneous fistula (PCF) incidence, stenosis incidence and feeding tube dependence (FTD) incidence. Network estimates from outcome variables were presented as absolute risks, odds ratio [OR] with 95% credible intervals (CIs), and ranking probability. RESULTS: A total of 1357 patients were included for 5 different interventions (tubed pectoralis muscle myocutaneous flap, t-PMMCF; tubed anterolateral tight flap, t-ALTF; tubed radial forearm free flap, t-RFFF; free jejunal flap, FJF; U-shaped pectoralis muscle myocutaneous flap, u-PMMCF). FJF showed a 92.8% chance of ranking first in terms of pharyngo-cutaneous fistula prevention (absolute risk: 10%), while the highest PCF incidence (42%) was measured for t-PMMCF. u-PMMCF showed the lowest absolute risk (11%) of stenosis incidence (62.2% chance of ranking first). t-PMMCF (5%), FJF (8%), and u-PMMCF (8%) showed similar results in terms of feeding tube dependence, with a 53.2%, 23.1% and 18.9% chance of ranking first, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FJF seems to be the best reconstructive choice after total laryngo-pharyngectomy in terms of PCF, stenosis and FTD incidence. If this reconstructive method is not feasible, a u-PMMCF should be favored over tubed free and pedicled flaps. Further comparative studies are needed to confirm these results.

Clinical outcomes following pharyngolaryngectomy reconstruction: a 20-year single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced malignant neoplasms of the larynx and hypopharynx pose many therapeutic challenges. Total pharyngolaryngectomy and total laryngectomy provide an opportunity to cure these tumours but are associated with significant morbidity. Reconstruction of the pharyngeal defect following total pharyngolaryngectomy demands careful consideration and remains an area of debate within surgical discussions. METHODS: This paper describes a systemic analysis of pharyngeal reconstruction following total pharyngolaryngectomy and total laryngectomy, leveraging data collected over a 20-year period at a large tertiary referral centre. RESULTS: Analysing 155 patients, the results show that circumferential pharyngeal defects and prior radiotherapy have a significant impact on surgical complications. In addition, free tissue transfer in larger pharyngeal defects showed lower rates of post-operative anastomosis leak and stricture. CONCLUSION: Pharyngeal resection carries a substantial risk of post-operative complications, and free tissue transfer appears to be an effective means of reconstruction for circumferential defects.

Functional Outcomes Following Total Laryngectomy and Pharyngolaryngectomy: A 20-Year Single Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal cancer accounts for 1% of all cancers in men and 0.3% of all cancers in women. Pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) and total laryngectomy (TL) are central surgical techniques in the management of advanced laryngeal malignancies but are associated with significant morbidity. In addition, optimal reconstruction following TPL remains an area of active research. METHODS: Here, we compared speech and swallowing outcomes following circumferential and partial pharyngeal resection alongside total laryngectomy in patients with laryngeal and hypolaryngeal tumors. We performed a systemic analysis of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modality, and pharyngeal reconstruction technique following TPL and TL, leveraging data collected over a 20-year period at a large tertiary referral center. RESULTS: Analyzing 155 patients the results show circumferential pharyngeal defects and prior radiotherapy have a significant impact on surgical complications. CONCLUSION: Pharyngeal resection carries a substantial risk of incurring impaired speech and swallowing in patients. Moreover, our results support poorer functional outcomes with more radical pharyngeal resections and show a clear trend toward worse swallowing outcomes in salvage surgery.

The role of nasopharyngectomy in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recently, endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) has become an effective treatment for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This article reviews recent publications on ENPG and specifically addresses the surgical anatomy of the nasopharynx and discusses several important issues regarding ENPG. RECENT FINDINGS: The surgical techniques for ENPG have been previously described in several studies. The latest published data revealed good outcomes of ENPG compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in recurrent NPC. In addition, ENPG avoids severe reirradiation side effects. This review highlights the surgical anatomy of ENPG, which is important in preventing possible serious complications. SUMMARY: ENPG is a good option for managing recurrent NPC. Careful preoperative evaluation and a full understanding of the surgical anatomy help in preventing damage to nearby critical neurovascular structure. Long-term follow-up is still needed to evaluate its eventual morbidity and efficacy.

Radiotherapy for hypopharynx cancers.

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy for hypopharynx. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is the gold standard treatment for hypopharynx cancers. Early T1 and T2 tumors could be treated by exclusive radiotherapy or surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy in case of high recurrence risk. For locally advanced tumours requiring total pharyngolaryngectomy (T2 or T3) or with significant lymph nodes involvement, induction chemotherapy followed by exclusive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy were possible. For T4 tumour, surgery must be proposed. The treatment of lymph nodes is based on initial primary tumour treatment. In non-surgical procedure, for 35 fractions, curative dose is 70Gy (2Gy per fraction) and prophylactic dose are 50 to 56Gy (2Gy per fraction in case of sequential radiotherapy or 1.6Gy in case of integrated simultaneous boost) radiotherapy; for 33 fractions, curative dose is 69.96Gy (2.12Gy per fraction) and prophylactic dose is 52.8Gy (1.6Gy per fraction in integrated simultaneous boost radiotherapy or 54Gy in 1.64Gy per fraction); for 30 fractions, curative dose is 66Gy (2.2Gy per fraction) and prophylactic dose is 54Gy (1.8Gy per fraction in integrated simultaneous boost radiotherapy). Doses over 2Gy per fraction could be done when chemotherapy is not used regarding potential larynx toxicity. Postoperatively, radiotherapy is used in locally advanced cancer with dose levels based on pathologic criteria, 60 to 66Gy for R1 resection and 54 to 60Gy for complete resection in bed tumour; 50 to 66Gy in lymph nodes areas regarding extracapsular spread. Volume delineation were based on guidelines cited in this article.